The fabled Hillary Clinton-David Goldstein connection. (Didn't you always know in your heart there was one?)
A hearty tip of the ol' Akubra to Number One Son, who'll be voting for the first time this year. I suspect I know where his sympathies lie.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Makes me wonder why I bothered with insurance
$3980.00The Cadaver Calculator - Find out how much your body is worth
I used to joke that I stayed underinsured because I felt safer being worth more alive than dead. (Don't laugh; you don't know my ex.) Now I wonder if it made any difference anyway.
Strangely, my Reverend Auntie is worth more than I am, despite being a much earlier model. Some might even say a classic. Then again, some might mutter darkly about expired "use-by" dates.
Mingle2 - Online Dating
I used to joke that I stayed underinsured because I felt safer being worth more alive than dead. (Don't laugh; you don't know my ex.) Now I wonder if it made any difference anyway.
Strangely, my Reverend Auntie is worth more than I am, despite being a much earlier model. Some might even say a classic. Then again, some might mutter darkly about expired "use-by" dates.
Just for the heck of it...
... and because My Lovely and Brilliant Pregnosaurus Wife will get a chuckle out of it:

A/T to Miss Cellania. Age cannot wither her...

A/T to Miss Cellania. Age cannot wither her...
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Seriously cool map
I'm a sucker for maps. Any kind of maps. I'll sit and look through an atlas for hours as if it were the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue.
So my Lovely and Brilliant Wife sent me this interactive historical map of Europe. You can go century by century from the year 1 to 2000, and see what peoples occupied which regions and which long-forgotten kingdom, empire or tinpot duchy was where.
I'm in grave danger of sitting and playing with this thing and neglecting my work.
So my Lovely and Brilliant Wife sent me this interactive historical map of Europe. You can go century by century from the year 1 to 2000, and see what peoples occupied which regions and which long-forgotten kingdom, empire or tinpot duchy was where.
I'm in grave danger of sitting and playing with this thing and neglecting my work.
Classroom skit
This is a hoot, in a really, really sick way. Clean, but I still feel like a horrible person for laughing so hard.
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Quickie prayer request
I just got a phone message at home from a place I sent a resume to, and I'll be going home at lunchtime to return the call. I never expected to hear from this office, and it's remotely possible it could involve a serious career improvement. It's a long shot, but then, with God there are no long shots. I'd be grateful for prayer if anybody sees this.
Update: I'm still playing phone tag. I'm sorry for being vague, but I'd just as soon not go into details. Honestly, I figured what I had applied for was a pipe dream.
And I haven't failed to notice that the people who jumped in with offers to pray are ones who, I gather, don't make a habit of prayer. So especially from you, that means a lot. Thanks, guys.
Updated Update (Thursday morning): Spoke briefly with the chap, and he's going to call me back this afternoon and set up an interview. I actually sent the resume in for something a bit different from what I'm hoping to get, but if I can impress him, I may have a whole new career ahead of me, one I've wanted to get into for years. (And one that pays enough to support a family on.)
Update: I'm still playing phone tag. I'm sorry for being vague, but I'd just as soon not go into details. Honestly, I figured what I had applied for was a pipe dream.
And I haven't failed to notice that the people who jumped in with offers to pray are ones who, I gather, don't make a habit of prayer. So especially from you, that means a lot. Thanks, guys.
Updated Update (Thursday morning): Spoke briefly with the chap, and he's going to call me back this afternoon and set up an interview. I actually sent the resume in for something a bit different from what I'm hoping to get, but if I can impress him, I may have a whole new career ahead of me, one I've wanted to get into for years. (And one that pays enough to support a family on.)
You've sold me
I'm of two minds on Scott Hahn. On the one hand, I really enjoy his apologetics and explanations of matters that seem weird to Protestants. His Hail Holy Queen was excellent, and I loved A Father Who Keeps His Promises, too. On the other hand, he has a condescending air that gets really old really fast. I like reading him as long as I can recall that I'm on the same side as him theologically.
So after reading Jeremy Lott's review of his latest book, which isn't an apologetic per se but a guide for giving apologetics, I think I'll have to make this one I buy as soon as I can swing it.
So after reading Jeremy Lott's review of his latest book, which isn't an apologetic per se but a guide for giving apologetics, I think I'll have to make this one I buy as soon as I can swing it.
While addressing unbelievers, Mr. Hahn avoids the common Protestant mistake of quoting the Bible at them as though that should settle the argument. ("No, the Bible is true. See, it says so right here.") When speaking of Protestants, however, he takes great pains to explain to fellow Catholics that it's okay to go verse for verse with our dear "separated brethren." He has to argue thus because the Good Book tends to serve a different function in Catholic and Protestant churches.
He's got a point: Protestants sometimes attack the Mass as "unbiblical," but that's patently false to anyone who has (a) read much of the Bible and (b) attended Catholic worship. The text of the Mass, which good Catholics attend at least once a week, is saturated with Scripture. Many of the short sayings are Bible verses, and the order of service has three readings — one from the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament), one from a Gospel and one from a non-Gospel New Testament book — along with a recitation of a Psalm and the Lord's Prayer.
There are many reasons why Catholics are reluctant to argue with Protestants about Scripture. The largest reason isn't their ignorance of the text as such but their relationship to it. Private Scripture reading by Catholics is encouraged — you can get an indulgence for it — but the public proclamation of the Word is what's important. The people stand when the Gospel is read and cross themselves three times, over their forehead, mouth and heart, out of respect and reverence. There is a sense, mistaken but understandable, that arguing about something so sacred would cheapen it.
A plea for divine mercy
Lord, I know You've been occasionally a tad, shall we say, harsh with mankind. A flood, ten plagues, mosquitoes, the Black Death... these are things we've come to associate with Your wrath. And no argument, we've deserved it.
But whatever You do, please, please, don't inflict this on us. Have mercy. We can't have sinned that badly.
Dire prophetic warning via Ken.
But whatever You do, please, please, don't inflict this on us. Have mercy. We can't have sinned that badly.
Dire prophetic warning via Ken.
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
As usual...
... Orson Scott Card makes good sense.
It's not encouraging, but regrettably, he's right all across the board. Americans don't like war, and that's a good thing. But I don't think we're going to be able to avoid it. The question is whether we wait long enough to be assured of defeat.
Only fools believe that an enemy cannot do what he threatens to do.
The Brits really believed that because they had a long reputation for ruling the ocean, Germany could not really challenge them. They ignored all the intelligence reports about Germany's effort to rebuild its army and, particularly, its air force.
They seemed to believe that just by being Britain, they could stop Germany whenever they wanted to.
Similarly, Americans seem to think that no matter what weapons Iran develops, when it becomes necessary we can stop them.
Well, maybe. But right now we could stop Iran without any threat of their detonating nuclear weapons anywhere. In a year or two or five (estimates vary, but the inevitability is not denied anywhere), we will have to stop Iran while facing the threat of the use of nuclear weapons against our armies.
If we invade a nuclear Iran, they will simply detonate nuclear weapons over their own soil to destroy our armies. And there is no technology currently foreseen that could stop them.
It's not encouraging, but regrettably, he's right all across the board. Americans don't like war, and that's a good thing. But I don't think we're going to be able to avoid it. The question is whether we wait long enough to be assured of defeat.
Maybe it should be called a golf coarse
These people have poisoned the well for every man who golfs. "Honest, honey, it's just a golf game. No lap dances. I promise!"
Fortunately, I don't golf myself. I figure if I ever have the urge to do something like that, I'll just take up a drug habit instead. It's cheaper, I'd get more time with my family, and I'd be able to quit easier.
Fortunately, I don't golf myself. I figure if I ever have the urge to do something like that, I'll just take up a drug habit instead. It's cheaper, I'd get more time with my family, and I'd be able to quit easier.
Monday, June 25, 2007
New blog!
A few weeks ago I quoted Gigantor's Blogger profile, where he described the need for God's word in these terms:
Now he's started bloggng at (appropriately enough) The Monkey on my Back. He and I disagree on an awful lot of things, but not on love for the Lord. Stop on over and welcome Gigantor to the blogosphere.
* I love mathematics and the sciences * physics * chemistry * astronomy but my number 1 passion is expositional study of the Word of God. I am addicted * hooked * if God's word were a monkey it would be on my back and I would feed until it over took me.
Now he's started bloggng at (appropriately enough) The Monkey on my Back. He and I disagree on an awful lot of things, but not on love for the Lord. Stop on over and welcome Gigantor to the blogosphere.
Pro-abortion brownshirts: Coming next for the doctors
One more step in the battle to render the health care professions Katolischenfrei:
Obscene? I daresay it is. Who do these doctors think they are? It's their job to follow orders, dammit, just like at Nuremberg and My Lai. If it meanns excommunication (and if you're Catholic, prescribing an abortifacient does mean that), then that's just the price you pay for obedience to a higher good.
Last year, pharmacists were slapped down for refusing to fill doctors' prescriptions for abortifacients. After all, shouted the uterofascists, a doctor knows what's best for the patient. A doctor's word is final, or at least it was before they started getting all uppity. Now those doctors figure they ought to be able to be members of their religion and physicians. That will be corrected shortly, as it becomes possible to simply deny admission to medical schools to practicing Christians. But in the meantime, those pesky discrimination laws make it necessary to take a slower approach. First they came for the pharmacists...
Once again we see that "choice" means doing as you're damn well told. And if you belong to a religion that the abortion industry finds unacceptable, then you'll convert or suffer the consequences. Kind of like radical Islam, but with better-looking belts.
A/T to Catholic Überblogger Mark Shea.
Whether you're asking about birth control, STDs or infertility, these discussions can be tinged with self-consciousness, even embarrassment. Now imagine those same conversations, but supercharged by the anxiety that your doctor might respond with moral condemnation — and actually refuse your requests.
That's exactly what's happening in medical offices and hospitals around the country: Catholic and conservative Christian health care providers are denying women a range of standard, legal medical care. Planned Parenthood M.D.s report patients coming to them because other gynecologists would not dole out birth control prescriptions or abortion referrals. Infertility clinics have turned away lesbians and unmarried women; anesthesiologists and obstetricians are refusing to do sterilizations; Catholic hospitals have delayed ending doomed pregnancies because abortions are only allowed to save the life of the mother. In a survey published this year in The New England Journal of Medicine, 63 percent of doctors said it is acceptable to tell patients they have moral objections to treatments, and 18 percent felt no obligation to refer patients elsewhere. And in a recent SELF.com poll, nearly 1 in 20 respondents said their doctors had refused to treat them for moral, ethical or religious reasons. "It's obscene," says Jamie D. Brooks, a former staff attorney for the National Health Law Program who continues to work on projects with the Los Angeles advocacy group. "Doctors swear an oath to serve their patients. But instead, they are allowing their religious beliefs to compromise patient care. And too often, the victims of this practice are women."
Obscene? I daresay it is. Who do these doctors think they are? It's their job to follow orders, dammit, just like at Nuremberg and My Lai. If it meanns excommunication (and if you're Catholic, prescribing an abortifacient does mean that), then that's just the price you pay for obedience to a higher good.
Last year, pharmacists were slapped down for refusing to fill doctors' prescriptions for abortifacients. After all, shouted the uterofascists, a doctor knows what's best for the patient. A doctor's word is final, or at least it was before they started getting all uppity. Now those doctors figure they ought to be able to be members of their religion and physicians. That will be corrected shortly, as it becomes possible to simply deny admission to medical schools to practicing Christians. But in the meantime, those pesky discrimination laws make it necessary to take a slower approach. First they came for the pharmacists...
Once again we see that "choice" means doing as you're damn well told. And if you belong to a religion that the abortion industry finds unacceptable, then you'll convert or suffer the consequences. Kind of like radical Islam, but with better-looking belts.
A/T to Catholic Überblogger Mark Shea.
Friday, June 22, 2007

Mingle2 - Online Dating
Apparently the bulk of the reason was the use of the word "abortion," which occurred 12 times. There was "death" twice, and "ass" twice, at least one of which actually referred to the animal (over in the sidebar).
But "abortion" is cause for an NC-17 rating? I guess pro-life talk just isn't suitable for moldable young minds.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
This woman needs to be legal now
I tend to avoid getting into illegal immigration on this blog, becuase I have some very mixed feelings about the issue as a whole.
But this time I don't have any ambivalence whatsoever. I don't care how wet or dry this woman's back is; her bill has been paid. In full, and with extreme interest. I hope Senator Kerry can get her a receipt.
But this time I don't have any ambivalence whatsoever. I don't care how wet or dry this woman's back is; her bill has been paid. In full, and with extreme interest. I hope Senator Kerry can get her a receipt.
Monday, June 18, 2007
We are all Paris Hilton
As a firm believer in the free market and the American way, I had to stop in my tracks when I read this from Jon Swift. I feel his pain, as I must feel hers.
Suddenly, candlelight vigils and 24-hour coverage just seem so... inadequate.
What has always made America different from other countries is that every citizen has an equal opportunity to become rich or, at least, to inherit great wealth. That is the American dream. That is why most Americans oppose high taxes for the wealthy and death taxes because they know that someday they might be well off themselves.
But the tragic saga of Paris Hilton has shattered that dream. How can we possibly have faith in the American system of justice when we see that despite having access to the best lawyers money can buy, Paris Hilton can be treated so cruelly? What hope do we have for the future when we see that even if we become a wealthy celebrity, we might still be subject to the harsh vagaries of the law.
First they came for Paris Hilton and I did not speak up because I was not Paris Hilton.
Suddenly, candlelight vigils and 24-hour coverage just seem so... inadequate.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Happy Father's Day
Saturday, June 16, 2007
Some things are self-demonstrating
My mom (a formidable woman with a doctorate in education, whom I contradict with care) firmly believes that sex roles are learned responses, not innate. But she's not in my living room at the moment, to see 1-year-old Mona carrying on an involved conversation with a stuffed elephant, while 3-year-old Dai (short for David) is "fixing" the vacuum cleaner by pounding on it with a plastic hammer. Some things you just don't have to argue.
Who will fill the great men's shoes?
In the comments about Ruth Bell Graham below, Paul brought up something that's been nagging at me ever since. Who, he asks, will our children look up to as the great men of God?
That's a really good question. In our lifetime (Paul and I are about the same age, and I guess most of my other readers are close, too), there have been a few men we could point to who were genuine men of God. Billy Graham is an obvious one. So is John Paul II. Both of these men were uniters in the true sense; they were loved by their own co-religionists and respected by those outside their own folds. They brought honor to the name of Jesus even among unbelievers. Both of them held true to their vows - one in marriage, one in celibacy - resisting that temptation that so often brings down clergymen of charisma. Both of them remained solid in the teachings they embraced, not watering down nor shifting themselves to be more acceptable to others. Both of them spoke the truth in all things, and both of them were quick to come publicly to the side of sinners. And despite (or perhaps because of) their differences between the two, they became close friends and brothers in the Lord.
I'm not trying to lionize Graham and John Paul here. There are any number of others out there whose work in the Lord's fields has yielded a strong harvest. But I chose those two examples because (a) they were the sort of men a Christian could imitate without hypocrisy, and (b) they're gone. Well, John Paul the Great is, and Billy Graham is likely to follow his wife at any time.
When we came of age in the 70s and 80s, my two examples were already old men, and well-established in the world. but who will there be for our children? When our kids come of age in this decade and the next, whom will they have to look up to? Are there men (and women) out there whom they can take as Christian role models? Ones who don't play to the cameras, who take vows and commitments seriously, who love Jesus more than they love political influence?
I can think of a few people who I think will have an impact in their elder years (assuming they stand firm), but I don't know if they'll ever be highly visible enough to inspire a generation. One who leaps to mind is Fr. Frank Pavone. He's obscure now, but I'll bet he won't be in ten years or so. I'd also like to see Frederica Mathews-Green come to the forefront more. She's the epitome of a faithful Christian feminist, the sort of woman I wouldn't mind my daughters emulating. It may be that Franklin Graham will be a fit successor to his father, but that's a huge shadow to escape.
Readers, can you think of anybody that you think can fill such huge shoes? We're not looking for divisive political figures here; there's a reason Billy Graham is respected outside the faith and Pat Robertson isn't. I'm especially curious to hear from the non-Christians out there. What Christian leader would you single out as the genuine article?
That's a really good question. In our lifetime (Paul and I are about the same age, and I guess most of my other readers are close, too), there have been a few men we could point to who were genuine men of God. Billy Graham is an obvious one. So is John Paul II. Both of these men were uniters in the true sense; they were loved by their own co-religionists and respected by those outside their own folds. They brought honor to the name of Jesus even among unbelievers. Both of them held true to their vows - one in marriage, one in celibacy - resisting that temptation that so often brings down clergymen of charisma. Both of them remained solid in the teachings they embraced, not watering down nor shifting themselves to be more acceptable to others. Both of them spoke the truth in all things, and both of them were quick to come publicly to the side of sinners. And despite (or perhaps because of) their differences between the two, they became close friends and brothers in the Lord.
I'm not trying to lionize Graham and John Paul here. There are any number of others out there whose work in the Lord's fields has yielded a strong harvest. But I chose those two examples because (a) they were the sort of men a Christian could imitate without hypocrisy, and (b) they're gone. Well, John Paul the Great is, and Billy Graham is likely to follow his wife at any time.
When we came of age in the 70s and 80s, my two examples were already old men, and well-established in the world. but who will there be for our children? When our kids come of age in this decade and the next, whom will they have to look up to? Are there men (and women) out there whom they can take as Christian role models? Ones who don't play to the cameras, who take vows and commitments seriously, who love Jesus more than they love political influence?
I can think of a few people who I think will have an impact in their elder years (assuming they stand firm), but I don't know if they'll ever be highly visible enough to inspire a generation. One who leaps to mind is Fr. Frank Pavone. He's obscure now, but I'll bet he won't be in ten years or so. I'd also like to see Frederica Mathews-Green come to the forefront more. She's the epitome of a faithful Christian feminist, the sort of woman I wouldn't mind my daughters emulating. It may be that Franklin Graham will be a fit successor to his father, but that's a huge shadow to escape.
Readers, can you think of anybody that you think can fill such huge shoes? We're not looking for divisive political figures here; there's a reason Billy Graham is respected outside the faith and Pat Robertson isn't. I'm especially curious to hear from the non-Christians out there. What Christian leader would you single out as the genuine article?
Thursday, June 14, 2007
She's gone
Ruth Bell Graham now travels in elephants. I know Protestants can't be officially canonized, but I wouldn't mind seeing her cause come up if that ever changed. Her husband may have been the one in the spotlight, but she was behind the scenes cheering him on and giving him strength. I'm betting he'll join her within six months.
Eternal rest grant unto her, O Lord, and may perpetual light shine upon her.
Update: Because Paul asked (blaming it on his wife), here's a copy of the story The Man Who Traveled in Elephants. You'll see why it fits the occasion. Have a hanky ready.
Eternal rest grant unto her, O Lord, and may perpetual light shine upon her.
Update: Because Paul asked (blaming it on his wife), here's a copy of the story The Man Who Traveled in Elephants. You'll see why it fits the occasion. Have a hanky ready.
A newspaperman's decalogue
Dave got the ball rolling on this one, all unintentionally, by posting his Business Process Manager's Prayer. Then Ken sidestepped the thing but exhorted the rest of us to take a stab at it.
Trouble is, my job at The Greatest Newspaper in the Northwest™ is kind of hard to define. I used to be the cut-and-paste guy, back when we used hot wax and exactos, and then it kind of evolved into what they call "Special Sections Manager." It means I handle the advertising supplements and "custom publications" that would otherwise fall into the cracks between the news and advertising departments. (There are some examples here. On those I do the writing (some of it, anyway), editing and layout, but there are also a bunch of little things that have kind of been dropped on my desk for lack of anybody else to assign to them. (Not to mention maintaining the website, which I'm learning from scratch.) A few years ago, I was the Lord of the Exacto; today, I just call myself the Layout Guru.
So here's my Ten Commandments:
1. I, even I, am Joel thy layout guru, which will be creating the publication that payeth thy mortgage. Thou shalt not piss me off.
2. Thou shalt not make unto me any illegible graven image, so shall thine ads and thy stories be perfect in thy sight.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of Joel thy layout guru in vain; neither shalt thou go tattling to the publisher when thou gettest not thy way.
4. Remember the deadline, to keep it holy. Thou hast had three weeks in which to turn in thy copy; woe be unto thee if thou sit upon it until the day on which it is to print. Five days shall I labor to complete thy project, but for the sixth and seventh I get no overtime, and would rather be home with a cold beer.
5. Honor thy pressmen and thine ad setters, that they may not come back bellyaching to me about thy treatment of them.
6. Thou shalt not cancel projects on which I have just spent thirty sleepless, breakless hours.
7. Thou shalt not drag me into thy silly-ass disputes with other salespeople. Verily, I give not a rat's patoot who said what to whom.
8. Thou shalt keep thy grubby hands off my desk. Yea, though it looketh like a job for FEMA, yet do I know where all things are hid, and will be mightily wroth should they be moved.
9. Thou shalt not throw thy layout guru under the bus when a customer complaineth about thine abjectly stupid screw-up. Face up to thine own incompetence.
10. Thou shalt not covet my job, for lo, it could be done by a trained chimp, except that the chimp would require too many shekels.
Trouble is, my job at The Greatest Newspaper in the Northwest™ is kind of hard to define. I used to be the cut-and-paste guy, back when we used hot wax and exactos, and then it kind of evolved into what they call "Special Sections Manager." It means I handle the advertising supplements and "custom publications" that would otherwise fall into the cracks between the news and advertising departments. (There are some examples here. On those I do the writing (some of it, anyway), editing and layout, but there are also a bunch of little things that have kind of been dropped on my desk for lack of anybody else to assign to them. (Not to mention maintaining the website, which I'm learning from scratch.) A few years ago, I was the Lord of the Exacto; today, I just call myself the Layout Guru.
So here's my Ten Commandments:
1. I, even I, am Joel thy layout guru, which will be creating the publication that payeth thy mortgage. Thou shalt not piss me off.
2. Thou shalt not make unto me any illegible graven image, so shall thine ads and thy stories be perfect in thy sight.
3. Thou shalt not take the name of Joel thy layout guru in vain; neither shalt thou go tattling to the publisher when thou gettest not thy way.
4. Remember the deadline, to keep it holy. Thou hast had three weeks in which to turn in thy copy; woe be unto thee if thou sit upon it until the day on which it is to print. Five days shall I labor to complete thy project, but for the sixth and seventh I get no overtime, and would rather be home with a cold beer.
5. Honor thy pressmen and thine ad setters, that they may not come back bellyaching to me about thy treatment of them.
6. Thou shalt not cancel projects on which I have just spent thirty sleepless, breakless hours.
7. Thou shalt not drag me into thy silly-ass disputes with other salespeople. Verily, I give not a rat's patoot who said what to whom.
8. Thou shalt keep thy grubby hands off my desk. Yea, though it looketh like a job for FEMA, yet do I know where all things are hid, and will be mightily wroth should they be moved.
9. Thou shalt not throw thy layout guru under the bus when a customer complaineth about thine abjectly stupid screw-up. Face up to thine own incompetence.
10. Thou shalt not covet my job, for lo, it could be done by a trained chimp, except that the chimp would require too many shekels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
